Why Are Television News Anchors So Irrelevant?

Most population by this point know whether subconsciously or consciously the main reasons for why Cnn, Msnbc, Abc, Cbs, and Fox News regulars act like a group of preppy high school girls. Let's briefly list 4 base reasons before interesting on to the fundamental explanation.

1) The nature of their work as charismatic and believable presenters of information rather than experts. It is key to mention that the separation in the middle of 24 hour cable networks and brief "serious" 6 Pm broadcasts on basic cable is disappearing. It used to be that the evening news audience demographic was numerically dominated by the group of elderly depression era females. This explained the need for senior citizens like Dan Rather who was ideal marriage material for the widowed viewers and delivered the authority of a small town doctor. To this day a doctor is shown by polls as the most respected wage laborer whose conception is considered the most specific (it makes doctors natural lead characters in Tv drama series and movies). However this demographic is dying off and being substituted by baby boomer women (greater female life expectancy always tilts corporate marginal profit seeking) who respect Katie Couric's professional achievement and quality to look good at her age.

Cables For Network

2) hold by biggest media corporations of Reagan's efforts to sell out funding for department of education (either straight through cheerleading it or tacit hold from silence). 40 year olds watching the news on Tv today were directly affected by the across the board discount in quality of schooling. Television and newspapers thus have to use less big words and their writers are increasingly relying on baby speak, puns, and outright prepackaged talking points (Gretchen Carlson playing dumb to keep her job is one extreme example of this). Shorter attention span is not the cause but the public symptom. This directly feeds into 3)

3) Msm responding to an Australian tabloid oligarch's invasion of United States with headlong rush towards turning news into entertainment. Of course this would have happened even without the accelerating influence of Rupert Murdoch's News Corporation conglomerate. The aging of current Tv demographic is permanent since mostly those remain who are unable to devotee the use of internet two way transmission medium. Since the audience is increasingly represented by rural senior citizens who were failed by the education drives in the 50s and 60s, the intensification of circus style hysterical entertainment as seen on the radio is obvious in the short term. Murdoch's influence must again be mentioned however. Newstartainment ( trademarked =] ) saw a publicly visible deepening split in the middle of internationalist media oligarchs (who encourage globalization since Usa is not indispensable to their base of operations) and nationalist media oligarchs who use their media asset influence to help out Usa based heavy industry. Nbc Universal can be said to be an example of a nationalist oligarch mouthpiece since it is owned by general electric (which is reliant on selling real tangible items like machine parts to Us soldiery and government organs). News

Corporation of course is not as reliant on the well being of United States military-industrial involved so its assets like Fox News can be extra irresponsible with their newstartainment. From the financial perspective it is better strategy for Ge's lowest line to hold nationalist Democratic party wing of the oligarchy (since better educated/healthier peasants allow Us based corps to better compete abroad). That is why Msnbc leans towards democratic millionaires and their businesses. The fact that Fox News was emulated points less to its success than to a transition of once Us tied corporations towards a more global status. For more information on who the top 10 owners of media clusters are, here is a handy chart (warning: This is from 2002 and the business got more consolidated and monolithic since then. Use it to get the thrust of the idea).

4) Losing ad earnings to the internet since television news (and Tv programming in general) did not live up to its promise of raising human consciousness as envisioned by the first head of the Fcc. The internet serves as a type of American glasnost while television serves as a way to sell state propaganda and mass produced Tv drama garbage at home and abroad. That is precisely recognizable. Getting young people's trust back (to keep going long term as old population die) is now almost impossible and the road of least resistance is to intensify the circus. Some young population watch the news and Mtv just to laugh at how terrible it is (that still is a mild boost to ad revenue). News "anchors" themselves do not come into experience with relevant information much since their networks have actively cut recruitment of journalistic investigative talent. Since it is cheaper to analyze second hand information with talking heads than hire enough numbers of understimulated human explorers (and pay for their plane tickets, hotel accommodation, security, etc), news anchors come less and less into real experience with knowledgeable experts. Ridiculous cowards like Wolf Blitzer for example, do not get hits to their self esteem as much from interaction with resident stay at home talking heads than with old school journalist data fiends like Michael Ware. To be fair, as Fox News anchors show, there is a lot of self censorship and dumbing down to remain on the job.

***drum roll***

And the underlining explanation is....

National news anchors and pundits are members of the wealthiest 5% or 1% of the population.

Even if they started out poor (which is increasingly becoming unlikely as key population in the conglomerate hierarchy flood these simple job openings with their children) the long cut throat climb to the top irreparably changed them. The laughing playboys on Tv are fully insulated from vast majority of the problems that Americans are facing (except of course problems of taxes on earnings and capital gains and regulations on financial gambling). whether they work for Fox, Cnn, Msnbc, many of them are good friends and are always on the look out to jump ship to an additional one network to bump up their salary. population like Anderson Cooper, Lou Dobbs, Sean Hannity would never be caught dead riding a piece of third world joyride called the Nyc subway.

To them life in America is great and getting better all the time. Every day is just an ego bolstering institution of whether driving from luxurious suburbs or being driven to a place where population put make up on them, where they see their friends, and where they talk to some senior population politicians/celebrities (who are plainly as insulated). They sit down and chit chat about the problems of places like Detroit ( which for all arduous purposes is as foreign and distant as cities in Africa are). They are goofy and full of giggles not just because they are professional entertainers but because the anchors that elderly population get their "news" from are but middle aged preppy high school girls on the equivalent of a fashion show.

Such dramatic disconnect having continued for as long as it has could only have created neurotic public perceptions the ripple effects of which we'll be feeling for years to come.

Why Are Television News Anchors So Irrelevant?

Friends Link : Choose Monitor kvm switch kit